Tuesday, 30 April 2013

iOS 7 Rumor Roundup

The usually overflowing well of Apple rumors has been oddly quiet when it comes to iOS 7. We have heard a few whispers here and there around development, but we’re in the dark as far as what specific features will make it to the finished product. It would seem that Jony Ive is a much better secret keeper than previous iOS helmer Scott Forstall. With a new version of the OS scheduled to debut in June, it’s high time we try and figure out what might be coming, and what we want from, the next iOS.

A flattened, less skeumorphic design
 rumor roundup apple ios 7 podcasts app screenshotOne of the first things that happened under Ive’s new leadership of iOS was a refresh of the almost universally reviled Podcasts app. It received a number of fixes and new features like iCloud-synced stations that can download new episodes automatically, as well as support for on-the-go playlists. The biggest change, however, was a visual one. The faux-tape deck and large, square buttons were trashed for a more cohesive design that was easier to navigate.
If the revamped Podcasts app is any indication, and it is, then we can expect to see a lot more of this across iOS 7. We wouldn’t be surprised if the Games Center app had the carpet ripped up and icons were generally flattened and made more iconic and less … shiny. Whatever he’s doing behind closed doors, Ive’s seems to be making an impression. Rene Ritchie of iMore said in a recent Branch chat that Ive’s work is “apparently making many people really happy, but will also apparently make rich-texture-loving designers sad.”

What we want from iOS 7

 

Much to my surprise as a Windows Phone / Android user, Apple still hasn’t mastered the art of background tasks. It can consistently throw you back into an app exactly where you left off, but that means the app usually does nothing while you were away. It’s simply frozen and unfrozen. Currently, apps like Spotify, and yes, even the new Podcasts app, need to be open to download new content. So the automatic download feature in the Podcasts app essentially just means new episodes begin downloading as soon as you open the app.

We’d like to see this fixed in iOS 7, with a nice mix of Android’s free-for-all task management and Windows Phone’s tightly managed, battery-savvy multi-tasking. Actually, it doesn’t even matter how Apple does it, as long as Spotify can sync without anyone looking at it. It’s not just media that’s affected either, the issue branches out into email (the Gmail app sends notifications, but doesn’t actually sync until you open it and refresh) and other areas.

“Notifications are still terrible.”
rumor roundup apple ios 7 mailbox app screenshot
As a whole, notifications feel a bit like a feature thrown in as a crowd pleaser that Apple couldn’t care less about. Android is ruling the roost in this department with 4.2.2 bringing actionable notifications, meaning you can choose to read or reply to text messages right from the drop-down menu, among other tasks. Apple users want that; everybody wants that. Notifications are one of the most difficult things to manage on a smartphone and they need all the help they can get. Making them swipeable would be a great first step; a more swipeable interface in general would help iOS a lot actually.
The swipe-happy Mailbox app is a good example of the demand for it on iOS, with a long line of people signing up to access the beta. The tiny X that currently only deletes notifications in batches (all emails or none of them) is no longer sufficient. Finally, the alert system could use an overhaul as well. It’s funny that Apple has yet to recognize the usefulness of an LED indicator. All Android phones have one. The current system of completely turning the screen on not once, but two times (assuming you don’t cliick on it first) is barbaric and wasteful of precious battery juice.

“iOS needs a visual overhaul.”
We covered this up top in the rumor section, but it bears repeating. Apple’s software is getting tired and it’s being left in the dust as Windows Phone continues to get more attractive and Android keeps getting more powerful. Part of that will happen with Ive’s enforcement of a more cohesive user experience that relies less on gradients and textures, but it needs to go further than that. User experience isn’t judged solely on the software’s look; it’s also based on ease of use. A unified way of handling settings would be a good first step. Currently, a random assortment of app settings are handled in-app with others accessed in the stand-alone Settings app.
Furthermore, we’d like to be able to use the apps we want to use, not the ones Apple is pushing. (And maybe Apple’s apps could be improved?) Most of the built-in apps on iOS suck, not just the mapping system. If someone wants to uninstall the built-in Weather app for instance, and replace it with the Weather Network app then that should be able to happen. And we’re just going to say it, if iOS 7 brought support for widgets – both on the lockscreen and the homescreen – we wouldn’t be upset. We might even be excited.
 

Genius Gila GX Review



gx gila gaming mouse rear right

Highs
  • 8200 DPI sensor
  • Solid build quality
  • Useful driver software
  • Good value
Lows
  • Difficult button placement
  • Ergonomics could be better

You probably haven’t heard the name Genius much in the world of gaming peripherals. Though not a new company, Genius has never been well known in North America and is just now making a serious push into the gaming market. Genius joins companies like Corsair and Cooler Master in challenging veterans such as Logitech, Razer, and MadCatz, and giving gamers more choice than ever before.
Genius, aware of the war waged for gamer’s hearts and wallets, has crafted a focused peripheral that makes no apologies and cuts no corners. Everything we could want is here, including a high-DPI sensor, on-the-fly sensitivity adjustment, numerous buttons with macro support, slick LED lighting, and even built-in memory that stores your settings (so you don’t have to re-adjust the mouse when you plug it in to a different PC). The insane feature set earned the mouse a CES Design And Engineering Award at CES 2013.
Even more impressive is the price. Though the MSRP is $100, which would be fair for a mouse with these features, the Gila GX can be purchased through Amazon for close to $75, and can be found on sale at other retailers for even less. Let’s see if Genius can compete with gaming’s old guard.

gx gila gaming mouse frontgx gila gaming mouse rgb backlight system macro

Tuesday, 23 April 2013

Celkon HD A119 Siganture: Review

Celkon Signature HD A119
pros
  • Good display
  • Camera
  • Battery life
cons
  • Just a dual core processor
  • Costly for a dual core phone from Indian brand
Celkon is not a very well known brand in North India but down South it has managed to penetrate the market, and it has now begun expanding to the north as well. Celkon Signature HD A119 is the first handset from Celkon that we are reviewing and on the face of it the device looks powerful.

The 5 inch phone comes with an HD display and 12 megapixel camera at the back and is based on Android 4.1, but unlike its competition with a similar sounding name, Micromax Canvas HD A116 gets only a 1 GHz dual core processor (Canvas HD gets a 1.2 GHz quad core processor). But in the rest of the specifications it actually matches or betters the Canvas HD A116. But how is it in the real world? Here is what we think of it after using it extensively.

Design 
The phone is a damn good looking piece of electronics. The front portion is glass covered and surrounded by a glossy black frame followed by a grey aluminum finish surrounding and then a metal finish back, though made of very thin but durable looking plastic.

The 12 megapixel camera unit protrudes from the back, but the glass is sunk slightly into the housing, protecting it from scratches. The camera unit is protected by a metal surrounding. It only has a regular port and the placement is usual but neat. Both a 3.5 mm jack and a USB port are on top. Removing the back cover reveals the two SIM slots placed side by side and a micro SD card slot all accessible without removing the battery. The power/lock button is on top and volume rocker is on the left.
The phone has a very narrow bezel around the display, which has kept the overall dimension of the phone very handy with a width of 74.5 mm and length of 148 mm. It's also very slim with a thickness of 9.3 mm.

Display 
Celkon Signature HD A116 has a 5 inch IPS panel display with 1280 x 720 pixel resolution, which is what Micromax Canvas HD A116 offers. It is in itself a great looking display. There is no pixelation and the viewing angle is great too.

Camera 
Celkon has put a 12 megapixel camera at the back and a 3 megapixel unit in front. Fortunately, unlike other Indian brands with tall claims of 8 megapixel delivering nothing better than 3-4 megapixel performance, this 12 megapixel autofocus camera does perform quite well. We even clicked pictures of documents and the text was crisp and clear. The colour and sharpness of images is really well recreated with just the right amount of saturation. There are no overly bright and colorful images, which many cameras do to make the image look better.

Performance 
Though the Celkon Signature HD A119 gets only a 1 GHz dual core processor, it is coupled with a healthy 1 GB of RAM and 4 GB of ROM (1.45 GB available for users). With a 1 GHz dual core processor we were not expecting a powerhouse of performance, and it is indeed not one either.

However, thanks to Android 4.1 Jelly Bean operating system, which is optimised for performance by Google through Project Butter, the phone performs smoothly. It does not offer really fast frame rates in games but it plays them without freezing.

Battery 
The phone gets a 2100 mAh battery, which offers almost two days of backup with low to medium usage, which is better than average for an Android handset in this range.

Celkon Signature HD A119OS and user interface 
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean operating system in this phone is more or less stock and there is very little that Celkon has tweaked, which is not too bad since stock Android 4.1 is really a well laid out operating system. Most of Celkon's contribution is limited to adding a few pre loaded apps like Newshunt (news aggregation

app), My Mango TV app etc.


Celkon Signature HD A119 Verdict 
Celkon Signature HD A119 is priced at Rs 13,500. As such it is priced about Rs 2,000 above other 5 inch dual core processor phones, and in fact is even costlier than Karbonn Titanium S5, which has a quad core processor. However, given that it has a great display, it is well designed with a nice quality feel to it and also gets one of the best cameras in this range. It is well worth the price. The performance of the phone is also good enough for most applications.

 Celkon is already a known brand at least in South India and according to some reports it is number five in terms of sales volumes across India, and therefore brand image will not be a problem for this phone. One thing that works in favour of Celkon and for which the company is in no way responsible is the increased price of Micromax Canvas HD A116, which is one of the toughest competitors for this phone, but it is at least Rs 2,000 costlier.

Celkon Signature HD A119: Review Specifications
Network GSM -900 MHz, 1800 MHz; UMTS - 2100
Operating System Android 4.1 Jelly Bean
Dimensions 148 x 74.5 x 9.3 mm , 177 grams
Display 5.0 inches, 1280 x 720 pixel
Input Method Touchscreen
Processor 1 GHz dual dual core
Memory 1 GB RAM, ROM 4 GB
Connectivity 3G, WiFi, Bluetooth
Multimedia Supports all major audio file types
Camera 12 megapixel auto focus, 3 megapixel in front
GPS Yes
Additional features In built user usable 4 GB, expandable 32 GB
Battery 2100 mAh
Warranty 1 year
Price Rs 13,490
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, 22 April 2013

Which smartphones and tablets are the greenest?

 
Awareness about the negative impact we are having on the planet has been growing in recent years. Big business and conspicuous consumption has contributed to pollution in the air and water, the production of toxic chemicals and waste, and dangerous working conditions for many workers. Climate change is undoubtedly having an impact on our planet. What can you do if you want to enjoy the latest smartphones and tablets, but minimize the potential harm caused in their production and use?
 

What does eco-friendly or green really mean?

The first obstacle you run into when you try to figure out whether a tablet or smartphone has green credentials is the complete lack of a consensus on what green or eco-friendly actually encompasses. Are we talking about the entire lifecycle of a product? There’s a lot to consider, and this is by no means an exhaustive list, but here are some questions to ask:
  • What materials are used?
  • Where did the materials come from?
  • How was the product manufactured with regard to worker conditions and pay, energy usage, and pollution?
  • Where did the packaging come from and how was it made?
  • How energy efficient is the device?
  • How easy is it to recycle and what waste products will it leave behind at the end of its life?
You may also want to consider whether the companies selling these devices are committed to eco-friendly practices at corporate level. Do they use clean energy, source sustainable supplies (like paper), and recycle at their offices? Do they have schemes to recycle or repurpose their products and extend the life cycle? Do they take part in any eco-friendly initiatives or voluntarily register for green assessment?

Independent assessment

If you ask a company how green they are, then they’ll always put their best side forward. If you want to get a realistic picture of their commitment, then you have to turn to independent assessors.
Ethical Consumer: For a really detailed breakdown of environmental and ethical considerations, you should check out the Ethical Consumer website. It has a comprehensive guide covering most of the top manufacturers, and rates them out of 20, providing links to stories related to various aspects of their business from environmental reporting, to workers’ rights, to political activities. You can use the slider controls to dictate what is important to you and customize the score, but you have to subscribe to get full access to the data.
Guide to Greener Electronics: You could also check out the Guide to Greener Electronics, published annually by Greenpeace. It focuses on three areas to determine a company’s score out of 10: energy and climate, greener products, and sustainable operations. You can find a detailed breakdown of the criteria used via the link above.
EPEAT: Then there’s the EPEAT register which is billed as “The definitive global registry for greener electronics.” It made headlines when Apple revealed it was dropping EPEAT certification and then reversed the decision after complaints from loyal customers. Sadly, EPEAT does not yet cover smartphones.

Green guides from wireless carriers

Virtually all carriers offer refurbished devices and/or trade-in programs. Most of them have recycling schemes in place, but some go a little bit further.
AT&T EcoSpace: AT&T has something called EcoSpace where the company highlights its eco-friendly side. It also has an eco-rating system for smartphones that gives each handset a score out of five, based on five criteria. For the record, the only two phones with five stars ratings right now are the Samsung Galaxy Exhilarate and the Samsung Galaxy Rugby Pro.
Sprint eco-criteria: Sprint also has its own eco-criteria for products, which also gives products a rating out of five, but is based on six criteria. The Samsung Replenish and LG Viper appear to be their highest rated eco-friendly phones with scores of four out of five.
Verizon Sustainability: Verizon has a Sustainability page where it highlights various recycling and donation schemes for old handsets and also highlights what it does as a company to be greener.

Who is the greenest of them all?

Figuring out the greenest manufacturer for you really depends on exactly what criteria are important to you and who you trust. It’s worth mentioning that many of the assessment schemes are voluntary. Apple doesn’t participate in any of the carrier rating schemes, preferring to publish its own guide to Apple and the Environment.
An Indian company called Wipro tops the Greenpeace list with 7.1 out of 10, followed by HP with a score of 5.7. Nokia, in third, is the best-placed smartphone manufacturer on the list with a score of 5.4 out of 10. Apple scores 4.5 and Samsung scores 4.2.
If we just look at the environment and product sustainability at Ethical Consumer then Nokia comes top again with a score of 12 out of 20. Motorola also scores 12 out of 20; HTC and Sony score 10; Apple and Samsung are both on 8 out of 10.
Obviously, the criteria you use changes the rankings significantly. If you were just to look at the use of hazardous materials in phone manufacturing, like Healthy Stuff did, then you’d get a chart like this (the lower the number, the less hazardous materials and chemicals were used).

 
 Healthy_Stuff_Phone_Ratings
 
 

Saturday, 20 April 2013

Google ‘to release in-house music streaming system this year’

Google will reportedly unveil a home entertainment system that streams music wirelessly later this year, marking the first time the search giant has developed consumer electronic devices under its own name.

 Google, Apple

Sources within the company told the Wall Street Journal that the unnamed device had been in development for several years and could be the first product to derive from the Project Tungsten system demonstrated last May.
The speculated product represents an escalation of Google’s ongoing competition with Apple.
Google’s Android operating system, which powers smartphones, tablets and televisions, is already reported to have overtaken the iPhone in market share last year.
Its pending purchase of Motorola Mobility Holdings is a clear sign of Google’s hardware intentions, while Apple moved into Google’s search territory with its voice-activated Siri service.
In addition, Google has been readying its own physical retail presence after previously only dealing with digital sales.
Google’s rumoured wireless music-streaming home entertainment system also represents a clear challenge to Apple’s AirPlay and Sonos.
A Google spokesman declined to comment to the Wall Street Journal on the rumours, while the Daily Telegraph said the product was unlikely to debut at the forthcoming Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.

Wednesday, 17 April 2013

Android-powered Google glasses set to ‘go on sale this year’

Google glasses will be available to buy , according to sources working on the project at the search engine giant’s headquarters.


Google glasses

The ground-breaking Google glasses will provide users with data on the move by streaming live information into the wearer’s eyeline.
As well as combining a number of different Google products, the glasses will also provide location-specific data and navigation services.
It will revolutionise how we interpret and see data on the move and could eventually replace smartphones as a wearable computer.
According to reports, the glasses are currently being developed at the company’s secret Google X lab where experts work with future technologies to create innovative new products.
The New York Times claims: ‘The people familiar with the Google glasses said they would be Android-based, and will include a small screen that will sit a few inches from someone’s eye.



Google, headquarters.


They will also have a 3G or 4G data connection and a number of sensors including motion and GPS.’
Rumours Google were developing a set of high-tech glasses first appeared in December.
It now appears the special spectacles will be launched sooner than expected.
The Android-based glasses will have a built in camera and will cost an estimated £350.
Google has declined to comment on the project.

Expect this to come after 5 to 6 years in India

After JellyBean it is Key Lime Pie

Although the Jelly Been Android update is still in development, Google is already cooking up its replacement, Key Lime Pie. 
 Google is to name the operating system after Jelly Bean Key Lime Pie.
Google names all its Android updates after desserts, and it is now reported that Key Lime Pie will follow on from Cupcake, Donut, Eclair, Frozen Yoghurt, Gingerbread, Honeycomb, ICS and Jelly Bean.
ICS is said to be the biggest overhaul yet of the Android system, incorporating an enhanced menu layout and fresh features, such as facial recognition unlocking and a faster internet browser.
However, it is not yet clear whether Key Lime Pie will be version 6.0 or simply an updated version of Jelly Bean.
The head of Google’s Android Stats Bureau, Andy Rubin, recently revealed that the firm’s manufacturing partners have activated a total of 300 million Android phones, with the current rate reaching 850,000 phones and tablets per day.
While Apple is the world’s leading phone manufacturer, Android is the most prevalent OS, reaching a market share of 46.5 per cent in 2011, according to Gartner.

Intel 3rd Gen processors (Ivy Bridge)...What is new


The Next Generation of Intelligent Innovations

As a manufacturer, Intel has committed to switching things up every generation of its cpu chips. They alternate between an architecture change and a die shrink with each other generation.

The 2nd generation of Core i-series processors was dubbed "Sandy Bridge" and was an architecture change from the previous CPUs.

The 3rd generation is called "Ivy Bridge," and is basically a copy of Sandy Bridge manufactured on a smaller scale, or die. However, Intel also focused on beefing up the integrated graphics in this generation.

Basically, 3rd generation "Ivy Bridge" CPUs have a small (5-10%) performance advantage over 2nd generation Sandy Bridge chips, however they also produce higher temperatures when overclocked which means it is harder to push them further in speed. Basically they even out when compared to Sandy Bridge's performance+overclocking.

However, the Ivy Bridge CPUs also use less power and have a more powerful graphics chip built in.

1. Ivy Bridge consumes a little less power; around 10w i think.

2. Slightly more processing power. On average with the same clock speeds Ivy Bridge CPUs are on average 3% - 4% faster than Sandy Bridge CPUs.

3. Ivy bridge uses intel HD 4000 vs intel HD 3000 in sandy bridge(2nd gen).. Ivy bridge is 40% more powerful


The two biggest things is the shrinking of the die and better integrated graphics.

Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 Review


Design:

Without a doubt, the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 jumps out most for its rarely seen multi-mode convertible aspect, which is a hallmark of the series. Visually, the Yoga 11’s interesting design scheme is further complemented by its sturdy construction, soft touch matte finish, and streamlined body. Compared to other Windows RT slates, the Yoga 11 is both thicker (0.61” / 15.5mm) and heavier (2.8 lbs / 1.27 kg), but we have to bear in mind that it’s packing along a full-sized QWERTY keyboard for added versatility. To top it off, we truly adore the various positions we can prop it in – essentially giving it some yoga-like moves. Ultimately though, it’s the unique flipping and twisting capabilities of the Yoga 11 that makes it a standout hit amongst the Windows RT crop.
The Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11’s interesting design is complemented by its sturdy construction - Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 Review 



Considering that the Yoga 11 is more laptop-like than tablet, it benefits from having an arsenal of ports. Around its edges, we find 2 full-sized USB 2.0 ports, a combo 3.5mm headphone jack, full-sized HDMI port, proprietary charging port, a full-sized SD card slot, and left/right speaker grills. In addition, there are a few physical buttons too, the power, orientation lock, and volume control, but unfortunately they’re all nearly flush and difficult to feel out.
 
The keyboard of the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 - Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 Review
The keyboard of the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 - Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 Review
Keyboard:

One step ahead of its Windows RT brethren, the IdeaPad Yoga 11 doesn’t require an optional keyboard to broaden its depth. Rather, it’s already there, ready and waiting! For those of us used to typing on a larger sized laptop, there’s some adjustment needed to get a good feel for the Yoga 11’s keyboard layout. However, after a bit of practice, we find ourselves moving relatively quickly. As for the keys, they’re slightly raised and bunched close to one another, but there’s a decent amount of travel with them. In addition to using the touchscreen, the trackpad also works well for a variety of navigational controls. Most importantly, it’s nice to find that the keyboard is deactivated when the Yoga 11 is propped up in its tablet and tent modes – though, it does feel a bit awkward feeling the buttons as we grasp the tablet with both hands.

 Display:

Somewhat expected to say the least, we’re not terribly wowed by the 11.6-inch 5-point capacitive HD Glare Multitouch display, as details lack that sense of sharpness with its 1366 x 768 resolution. However, for most trivial things, such as surfing the web, it’s more than adequate for the job. Despite that, we have to admit that our eyes really take notice of its punchy color tones, which receive more vibrancy thanks to its 350 nit brightness. Viewing angles are good, but outdoor usage still requires some proper shielding from the sun.
Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 runs Windows RT - Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 ReviewLenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 runs Windows RT - Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 Review

Interface and Functionality:

After spending a great deal of time with the full blown Windows 8 experience, it’s surely something trying to get back into the swing of things with Windows RT. Actually, we almost forgot this is the Windows RT, mainly because on the surface, there’s nothing too ornate that differentiates the two. In fact, the Start screen is a familiar one with its dynamic live tiles – plus, the Windows Store is home to a growing list of apps. However, upon going into the desktop mode, we realize that there’s no support for legacy software, which is the single drawback of Windows RT. Regardless of that, it’s nice to see that Lenovo doesn’t add any bloatware out of the box, thus, keeping it as stock as possible. Oh yeah, it’s absolutely stellar to find Microsoft Office Home and Student 2013 RT preloaded!

Certainly, the best option for typing is to use the Yoga 11’s physical keyboard, but as an alternative with its touchscreen, we can also rely on the on-screen options as well – especially when we’re using it in tent or tablet modes. Spacious with its layout and responsive, it works as good as the physical one, so it’s a matter of choice on which one to stick with.

Processor and Memory:

Being a Windows RT device, the Yoga 11 relies on NVIDIA’s 1.4GHz quad-core Tegra 3 chipset coupled with 2GB of RAM and the NVIDIA ULP GeForce GPU for its processing might. For what it’s worth, it’s effective enough to handle most tasks, but it easily begins to show some strain with more processor intensive things. For example, it’s buttery smooth navigating across the Start Screen, but when we’re executing some heavy multi-tasking, such as using two apps in split view, its performance tends to stutter a tiny bit. Luckily, it’s never to the point frustrating.

Sure, it’s lugging around a 64GB SSD inside of its body, but when it’s all said and done out of the box, it translates over to roughly a little over 40GB of free storage. Nevertheless, the full-sized SD card slot and USB ports are there to supplement its capacity.

Internet and Connectivity:

By now, we might sound like a broken record, but the web browsing experience with Internet Explorer on the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 is wonderful, which is what we kind of expect from most Windows RT slates at this point. Quickly loading complex web sites, its top-notch performance is also evident in other navigational controls – such as instant page rendering, responsive pinch zooming, and fluid kinetic scrolling. Strictly an 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi convertible, there’s no word if we’ll see variants outfitted with cellular data connectivity. Despite that, it’s sporting the typical set of connectivity features – like aGPS, Bluetooth 4.0, and HDMI-out functionality.

Camera:

Limited to snapping self-portraits and the occasional video-chatting session, there’s nothing great to say about the quality of its 1-megapixel camera. Obviously, it serves its purpose in those aforementioned tasks, but it also has the ability to shoot 720p videos as well – though, its quality isn’t something worth bragging about.


Multimedia:

Consistency is what makes Microsoft’s platform unique, so there are few differences with the core experience. So much so that the music player on the Yoga 11 is the same identical one used by all the other Windows RT tablets out there. Armed with left and right speakers, its output is on the weak side, but at least there’s no crackling or distortion at the loudest volume setting.



Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 Review 
 Battery:
After using the Lenovo IdeaPad extensively, we forget that we’re dealing with a Windows RT device here. Hiding away a 4-cell battery in its skinny chassis, the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 is able to effectively give us more than a solid day of normal usage with a fully charged battery. To tell you the truth, even power users will be impressed by its longevity!

Conclusion:

On the average right now, you can pick up the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 for approximately $600, which quite frankly, seems to be grossly expensive for a Windows RT device. However, when we add in the fact that it’s boasting an extremely usable keyboard, combined with its cool convertible aspect, the Yoga 11 is a great netbook replacement. Sure, you won’t be able to install legacy software, but if you’re looking for the basics, this will suffice for most things. Honestly people, with so much versatility packed into this netbook-like replacement, it’s certain to stand out amongst the existing crop of Windows RT devices that have been out on the market, due to its different form factor.

LG Lucid 2 Review

Design:

The LG Lucid 2 fits comfortably in the hand, thanks to its compact size and is fairly lightweight at only 4.55 oz. The overall design of the LG Lucid 2 is a bit more stylish than the original, combining both curved and straight edges, with only a small amount of silver on the sides. Also gone is the slipper plastic, and instead the battery cover is textured, which provides an improved grip.
LG Lucid 2 ReviewLG Lucid 2 
Display:

With high-res displays going from 720p to 1080p over the past year, some might feel that the one on the LG Lucid 2 is a bit outdated. While this may be true when it comes to high end phones, the 4.3” qHD AH-IPS display on the Lucid 2 with 540x960 pixel resolution does a fine job. There is plenty of fine detail with text and images looking sharp, good color reproduction, as well as being bright enough to view outside. Our only complaint is that the viewing angles are limited, meaning any off-axis viewing will see a drop in saturation and contrast.
 
Android core apps - LG Lucid 2 Review
Interface and Functionality:
Running on Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean, the LG lucid 2 comes with a similar Optimus UI layer over it, as what we’ve seen on the LG Spectrum 2. It does a good job of making the interface attractive and easy to use, along with 7 home screens, app drawer, and a nice selection of widgets.
 
Processor and Memory:

Since the original LG Lucid came with a 1.2GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 processor, we’re glad to see that the Lucid 2 comes with a dual-core Snapdragon S4 MSM8960 processor. Though we find it interesting that even though the specs say it is 1.2GHz, both AnTuTu and Quadrant identify it as being 1.5GHz. Regardless, the Lucid 2 is plenty fast, and the 1GB of RAM also help speed things along.
Even though the LG Lucid 2 comes with 8GB of internal memory, only 3GB is available to the user. Though you can install a microSDHC memory card up to 64GB in size for added storage space.

Internet and Connectivity:

As with several other phones these days, the LG Lucid 2 relies on Google Chrome for its web browser. It works well on the device, as scrolling & zooming are smooth and effortless, and web pages are properly rendered. Yeah, we know that Adobe Flash is not supported, but with most sites making the change to HTML5, we didn’t have too much of an issue. Naturally, you can install other browsers if you wish, such as Dolphin.
 
Camera:

We found that the included 5MP camera on the LG Lucid 2 does slightly better than the original LG Lucid. Images that we took outside have a bit more detail to them, as well as natural looking colors, but still appear relatively soft, instead of sharp and crisp. This trend continues for indoor shots, as with lower light levels produce even softer looking images. The LED Flash does illuminate a room well, but it causes the image to have a yellowish hue.
For recording videos, the Lucid 2 is capable of Full HD 1920x1080p resolution at 30 frames-per-second. Colors were pleasing, and the exposure was accurate, but again the detail was not as sharp as we would like.
 
Multimedia:

The music player is pleasing is easy to use, with tabs across the top for songs, albums, artists, genres, playlists, and folders. Though it does lack some eye candy that we’ve seen on LG’s higher-end Optimus line. When playing music through the rear speaker, there is plenty of volume, but we noticed that low and mid tones are missing, which causes music to should shrill and lacking in fullness. Using a pair of earbuds will solve this, but we still wish there were equalizer settings to bring lower tones out.

Even though the Lucid 2 has a 4.3” qHD display, videos played just fine, and were nice and smooth, supporting MP4, H.263/264, DivX and XviD with resolutions up to 1080p. DLNA is also supported, as well as SmartShare, to allow for easy streaming and viewing between multiple devices.
 
Conclusion:
 It is small and lightweight, making it easy to carry around, the 4.3” qHD display is a nice size with clear text and images, the user interface is well laid-out and easy to use, not to mention the device has good call quality and a larger capacity battery. We do wish that the camera/video recording was a bit better, as well as the music player, but for this price, it’s hard to complain.
 
 

Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3: A Specifications Review

Coming soon in India.

The display is easily the biggest attraction of the Mega 6.3
OS – Android 4.2 Jelly Bean with TouchWiz UI
That the Mega 6.3 comes with Android 4.2 Jelly Bean is heartening to see in an age when software updates are becoming thinner by the day. However, the latest version of Android has been covered up by TouchWiz's bright, and peppy UI. There are some nifty additions to the interface, which Samsung claims will improve the overall user experience.

The homescreen has a cleaner design now and looks less cluttered. The app drawer looks the same as it did on the Galaxy S4, and the cosmetic changes in Samsung’s flagship have been retained in Mega 6.3 as well. The Settings page, for example, now has a tabbed interface, which is a great way to quickly spot what you want to change, instead of scrolling and trying to find the right setting. Samsung has taken Air View and Smart Stay to the next logical step and e

nhanced their functionality. However, we can foresee users getting confused by the plethora of software features in the phone. Thankfully, they are easily accessible through the two-finger drag on the notification bar. Galaxy Mega will also get the Multi-Window mode that was first seen in the Galaxy Note 2.

We expect many of the other features such as S Translator, the bevy of camera apps and the S Health app from the S4 to make an appearance in the Galaxy Mega as well.
Cellular connectivity – LTE and 3G (HSPA+)
The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 comes with LTE connectivity, but if your region has no 4G infrastructure, it will still support HSPA connectivity. The phone supports Cat 3 LTE, so theoretically you will get download speeds of up to 100Mbps and 50Mbps for uploads.

Display – 6.3-inch TFT capacitive display; resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels
Of course, with a name like Mega, the smartphone has a giant display. The 6.3-inch display is the largest we have seen on a mainstream smartphone, and it dwarfs the Galaxy Note 2 comfortably. The display has a 720p resolution, which means a pixel density of around 233 ppi.

Form factor – Only slightly refreshed
Samsung has stuck to the redesigned Galaxy S4 body as a blueprint for the Galaxy Mega 6.3. The smartphone adopts angular lines on the sides, while the slightly rounded bends give it an elegant look. Despite its massive footprint, the Mega cuts a pretty, if somewhat plain, picture. The back of the phone has a very subtle cross-hatch pattern and the sides are covered by a faux-metallic material. We would have preferred actual aluminium, but it would have added greatly to the 199 g bulk. However, despite being slightly heavy, the Mega 6.3 is a very slim device with a depth of 8 mm. All in all, we can’t find many details that look out of place on the device and it should feel like home for Samsung aficionados.

Wi-Fi – Packed to the gills
In this department, Samsung has thrown in everything that’s top of the line in terms of wireless connectivity. The Galaxy Mega supports Wi-Fi 802.11 a/ac/b/g/n bands along with support for dual-band Wi-Fi. Multimedia content can be sent to your TV thanks to the DLNA, while Wi-Fi Direct can be used to share files with other phones on the same network.

SoC – Exynos 5250, dual-core 1.7GHz CPU with Mali-T604 GPU
Potential buyers of the Galaxy Mega can expect superb performance from the dual Cortex-A15 cores. The much-talked about Exynos 5410 Octa processor will not be seen here, but the replacement Exynos 5250 is no slouch either. You would have seen the processor being used for the Google Nexus 10 tablet, which was also made by Samsung. The dual-core CPU is clocked at 1.7GHz and it’s coupled with the Mali-T604 GPU. The Galaxy Mega has also been endowed with 1.5GB of RAM.

Internal storage – Two variants with microSD card slot
Users can get either the 8 or 16GB-toting Galaxy Mega and as usual, you will find a microSD card slot to expand the storage up to a further 64GB. That should be more than enough space to load up high-definition movies for viewing on the large display
Cameras – 8 megapixel primary camera and 1.9 megapixel front-facing camera
While Samsung chose to endow the Galaxy S4 with a 13 megapixel camera, the Mega gets an 8 megapixel unit, which sounds very much like the module used on the Galaxy S3. Despite being a 2012 camera module in a way, the camera should benefit from all the imaging features that Samsung will be packing into the camera firmware. There’s an LED flash along with the primary camera, which should help in low light situations, but don’t expect miracles. Other features include touch focus, face and smile detection, and HDR mode for shooting stills.

The front-facing camera is a decent 1.9-megapixel, which should be more than enough for video calls and the odd self-portraits. Details about the maximum video resolution of the front-facing camera have not been revealed.

Sensors – The usual suspects
The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 has the usual accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass and ambient light sensors.

GPS
Samsung has been including GLONASS support for a long time now and the Galaxy Mega also benefits from the chip. Along with Assisted GPS, the maps experience on the Galaxy Mega should be great, especially with all that screen real estate. Location lock times will be drastically lower, thanks to the GLONASS support.

NFC
Galaxy Mega has an NFC chip, which is becoming increasingly prevalent in all manner of devices. It is an essential component in mobile payments and can also be used to establish connections between devices and consequently to share files over Wi-Fi Direct.
Despite the large display, Samsung has managed to keep the Galaxy Mega 6.3's waistline down to 8mm

Battery – Li-Ion 3200 mAh battery
Thanks to that large display, the Galaxy Mega 6.3 comes with a generous 3200 mAh battery, which sounds like a dream. Given the specs of the phone, we can safely say that the smartphone will be on for most of the day, unless your average use scenario is watching high-definition videos endlessly. The back of the Galaxy Mega is removable, so you can replace the battery any time you want.
The bottom line
The Galaxy Mega 6.3 will please those who are looking for a Note-like device, but without the added baggage of the S-Pen or the higher price. The large display is a great point in favour of the Mega 6.3. Indeed, from the looks of it, it seems a worthy second fiddle to the Galaxy Note and could very well repeat the success of the Samsung Galaxy Grand in the big phablet segment.

If priced between Rs 25,000 and Rs 27,000, the Galaxy Mega 6.3 seems like a winner and could be an attractive alternative to potential phablet buyers. Overall, thanks to the Galaxy S4-like design, the massive displays and large battery capacities, the Galaxy Mega 6.3 sounds like a great proposition on paper.

Samsung Galaxy Express Review


Samsung Galaxy Express Review


The Samsung Galaxy Express is a mid-range device that has already launched in the United States, but now it is making its way to Europe in a version that is similar, but also different in key areas. It is the same 4.5-inch Android handset, but in this modification it runs on an (almost) up-to-date Android 4.1 and features Qualcomm’s energy-savvy 28nm Krait processor on a Snapdragon chip with 4G LTE support.

That’s definitely a big asset for a relatively affordable device, but you know Samsung had to cut it short somewhere to arrive at its lower price. And indeed it has with the most visible shortcut being a 5-megapixel camera. How huge of a compromise is that and is it worth making? Let’s find out.

The Samsung Galaxy Express is practical and feels well in the hand - Samsung Galaxy Express Review

Design:

If you appreciate original design, we’d definitely understand your frustration with the Galaxy Express. It is the same generic iteration on the Galaxy S III pebble-like form that we have seen so many times already. It’s practical and feels well in the hand with its nicely rounded corners and relatively thin 0.37-inch (9.3mm) profile, but it’s definitely not awe-inspiring, not something that we’d feel attached to emotionally. The device is built out of plastic and comes with a glossy finish

Display:

The Galaxy Express comes with a 4.5-inch Super AMOLED Plus capacitive touchscreen with vivid saturated colors. There is only one downside to it - it is of the disappointing for its size WVGA 480 x 800 pixel resolution. On the 4.5-inch that works out to a low pixel density of around 200ppi and while that’s not such a huge deal, it definitely has a noticeable impact on things like text readability.

With that said, we have to give credit where credit is due. Despite its disappointing resolution, the screen looks good. Colors are vivid, blacks are pitch black, viewing angles are wide, and sunlight legibility is good.

The Samsung Galaxy Express runs on Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean - Samsung Galaxy Express ReviewInterface and Functionality:

Samsung Galaxy Express runs on a contemporary version of Android and that is 4.1.2 Jelly Bean. On top of it, there is a sprinkle of TouchWiz Nature UX flavor with its watery sounds and plenty of other additions we mostly like. It brings improvements first and foremost to basic functionality - you have smart dialing in the contacts app and you can swipe left on a contact to directly call them or swipe right to send a text message. Also, in messages you can attach locations easily..
Processor and Memory:

First and foremost, though, it’s worth pointing out that everything flows smoothly with absolutely no lag. We can’t help noticing how much of an improvement has come with Project Butter in Android Jelly Bean in regards to Android lag, and now it’s gone on almost all JB devices.

Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy Express has a serious brain: a 1.2 GHz dual-core Qualcomm MSM8960 chip with Adreno 305 graphics and 1GB of RAM. This might not seem like a terribly potent hardware choice, but keep in mind that this device comes with a 480x800-pixel screen. That means less pixels to process than other modern smartphones, and ultimately an easier task for the processor.

Internet and Connectivity:

On this device, you get the choice between the traditional Android stock browser and Chrome. Both work really well, rendering pages quickly and with smooth scrolling and zooming.

The device is well equipped in terms of connectivity. 4G LTE support on a mid-range device is rarity in Europe and most markets outside the United States, and the Galaxy Express supports it. The handset also supports 21.1Mbps HSPA, quad-band GSM, GPS, Wi-Fi a/b/g/n and Bluetooth 4.0.

Conclusion:

Finally, we can confidently say the Galaxy Express is a very solid mid-range device. It comes with two compromises that you have to take into account. The first one that we are ready to forgive it is a 480x800-pixel screen which works out to a sub-par pixel density. The screen however is bright and vivid, which partly makes up for that. The second one is the 5-megapixel rear camera. It produces decent shots, but nothing too impressive, and if you plan on using the camera extensively we would recommend you look at other options. But if that’s not your primary concern and you care more about a great performing and energy-savvy device, the Galaxy Express will not disappoint.

samsung galaxy young review

A super-budget smartphone with a cutting edge OS

Samsung Galaxy Young review

For

  • Small
  • Android Jelly Bean

Against

  • Chunky
  • No flash on camera
As the name clearly suggests, this is a smartphone designed for the whippersnappers, those who don't want to do anything more than download a few apps, show off to their friends and generally do smartphone things that don't involve trawling through a million menus to achieve.
The specs on the Samsung Galaxy Young are pretty much the lowest you can imagine on a modern smartphone, with a 3.27-inch screen with an HVGA resolution. It's also rocking Android Jelly Bean with version 4.1.2 under the hood, but sadly that doesn't include the likes of S Beam because there's no NFC onboard.
Samsung Galaxy Young review
Here's a confusing conundrum: there's a 1GHZ processor, but more RAM than in the Samsung Galaxy Fame - which is meant to be a more powerful handset to play with. It doesn't mean that the Young is powerful enough to do what you always want to do, as sometimes opening and closing applications isn't the smooth experience we were expecting; after all, it wasn't that long ago that we were lauding the HTC Desire for having a 1GHz processor, and that was slick as you like..
But it's not terrible though, and the Samsung Galaxy Young is certainly able to do a lot of things that you're after - for instance, the messaging capability of the handset is excellent..
Moving onto the design, and the second you pick up the phone you realise it's a budget device - the 12.5mm (0.49-inch) thickness is apparent in the hand instantly. It's a fat little phone, and with a 1300mAh battery, and we're wondering if that's enough to keep the battery chugging along in the background.
The screen being lower resolution is going to help though, since that means fewer pixels to drive and therefore taking less power over the course of the day. Sadly that low resolution doesn't mean that the Young is going to be a great device to watch video or browse the internet on, because despite the higher pixels per inch compared to the Fame, it's a very blocky screen to check out.
The camera is also as low as any manufacturer could get away with, with a 3MP camera bolted on the back and no LED flash, so no low-light level pics for you with this phone. Or any self-portrait shots, as there's no front-facing camera either.
Samsung Galaxy Young review

verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Young is a phone that you can imagine the younger teenager who wants a modern smartphone asking for at their birthday. It's not got a price as yet, but it won't cost that much money to pick up without a contract, and with the ability to set data limits on the phone, parents will be happy that they won't be hit with whopping bills.
It's an uninspiring phone for the spec-hungry fan, but it copies the Samsung Galaxy S3 styling and for that reason alone we can see a few skirt hems being tugged as children give their parents the big eyes as they look to get something that's newer than their friends' phones.

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

XOLO X1000 REVIEW


Xolo has been on launching spree off late. The company has launched the Xolo A700, Xolo A800, Xolo A1000, Xolo Q800 and even Intel based Xolo X500. Xolo X1000 is the latest to join the league. As is 'X' series smartphones, it comes with Intel's chipset.
The phone is powered by 2GHz Intel Atom Z2480 processor, prompting Intel to call it the 'fastest smartphone in the world' - probably based purely on the clock speed.
This is a single-SIM smartphone from the company. Priced at Rs. 19,999, it is also the most expensive smartphone that the company is offering currently. Here's our take on this smartphone.


Design/ Build
When Xolo had launched the Xolo A1000 , we had mentioned that the smartphone comes with stunning looks. With Xolo X1000, the company has raised the bar even higher.
Xolo X1000 sports a uni-body design and the black and steel combo gives the smartphone a premium look. It comes with 4.7-inch TFT LCD has a 2.5 D edge-to-edge curved glass panel. There is a front camera and speaker grill located on the top of the display in the middle. There are no physical buttons on the front of the smartphone.
It also has well-rounded corners with a rubbery finish at the back, which makes the smartphone easy to grip. The top panel houses the power/ standby button and the 3.5mm audio jack. On the bottom panel is the USB/charging slot. The left panel houses the volume rocker button, while the right panel has been left blank.
On the back, there is 8-megapixel camera and an aesthetically placed thin steel strip just below the camera. As it is a uni-body smartphone, the consumers cannot access the battery. However, there is a small button at back that be pushed to expose the SIM slot and the microSD card slot. However, consumers who do not have long fingers might find inserting SIM and microSD in the tiny slots an ordeal.
Another thing that adds to Xolo X1000's style quotient is that the device is just 9.1 mm thick. The device weighs 140 grams.
On the overall, we find that Xolo has worked quite hard on design element of this smartphone and tried to give it a premium look.
Display
Xolo X1000 comes with 4.7-inch screen with 720x1280 pixel '2.5 D' edge-to-edge curved glass display and a pixel density of 312 ppi. We found the screen to be quite bright and sporting good colour reproduction. The viewing angles on the Xolo X1000 are good and sunlight legibility is respectable. Reading eBooks, watching Youtube clips and browsing pictures on this smartphone is a pleasurable affair.
We found that the display of this smartphone to be better than that of similarly priced Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos. As a matter of fact, the display Xolo X1000 had an edge over the recently launched Micromax Canvas HD too (which is priced at Rs. 14,499).
Xolo X1000 has a reflective screen. The touch response of this smartphone is good.

Camera
Xolo X1000 packs in an 8-megapixel rear camera with a 15fps burst mode. We experienced no lags while clicking pictures. The images taken through the rear camera under daylight are very sharp. Pictures clicked indoors are respectable as well.
This smartphone also comes with front-facing 1.3-megapxiel camera. Clicking pictures and making video calls through this camera is a standard affair.
The back camera is also capable of shooting full-HD video at 30 frames per second. The quality of videos captured through Xolo X1000 is good as well.
Xolo_X1000_software.jpg
Software/ Interface
The biggest downside for Xolo X1000 is that it runs on Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) out of the box. However, the company has indicated that they are working on providing update to Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) really soon and one can expect the same to land on this smartphone by the beginning of next quarter. The company has also indicated that the upgrade with be pushed out over-the-air (OTA) just like the way it had done for its Xolo X900.
Xolo X1000 runs on the stock version of Android 4.0. The smartphone comes with five customisable home screens to fill with widgets and icons. Xolo X1000 also comes pre-loaded with apps such as Dropbox, FM Radio, Memo, Movie Studio, PIM backup, Play Music, News and weather, Wireless display, Xolo Care and Weather forecast. The smartphone also has Chrome and stock Android browser pre-installed.
With the help of FM Radio app, one can listen to their favourite radio stations on the go. The app also allows one to save six favourite FM radio stations for easy access.
Performance/ Battery
Before the launch of this smartphone, it was expected that Xolo will be packing in Intel Clover Trail+ chipset in this smartphone. However, Xolo has used Intel Atom Z2480 processor in this smartphone. The processor is augmented with Intel's "Hyper Threading technology and can clock speed of 2GHz. Xolo X1000 also comes with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage. The smartphone is very responsive and we did not face any lags of any sort while playing around with it.
Video playback of this smartphone is good. However, one cannot play any .avi files on this smartphone but that can be easily fixed by downloading an app from the Google Play Store. The audio playback on this smartphone through speakers as well as headphones is quite loud and clear.
Playing popular games such as Temple Run 2, Angry Birds and Subway Surfer is a breezy affair. However, not all high-end games are compatible with the phone due to its Intel chipset. Xolo_X1000_screenshot.png

 Verdict
Looking for a beautiful smartphone that has a good display? Then Xolo X1000 may fit the bill for you. The smartphone is also quite zippy and can handle multitasking well. However, at the moment this smartphone is running on Android 4.0, rather than Android 4.1, this could be deal breaker for some consumers and they might want to check out Micromax Canvas HD and Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos

Pros
  • Stunning looks and solid build quality
  • Good display
  • Zippy performance
Cons
  • Runs on the dated Android Ice Cream Sandwich
Price: Rs.19,999
Ratings (Out of 5)
Design: 4
Display: 4
Camera: 3
Performance: 3
Software: 3
Battery Life: 3.5
Value for Money: 3
Overall: 3

HTC First ----- Is it

not available in India yet...
HTC First. Phones, HTC, HTC First, Facebook, Facebook Home 11

We’ve got smartphone fatigue. It’s always a new iPhone, new Windows Phone, new Android phone with Samsung’s latest TouchWiz UX, or a lifesaver the folks at BlackBerry are trying to cook up, dominating the news cycle on a daily basis.
This is why we were intrigued with the announcement of the HTC First at the beginning of April, the "Facebook Phone" that had been rumoured since November 2011 when it was supposedly codenamed "Buffy". The HTC First is the first handset to offer Facebook Home pre-loaded, the social network’s custom Android launcher to "focus on people and not apps".
The HTC First is modest compared to the Taiwan-based manufacturer's new HTC One, the towering flagship that we’ve given great marks. But it’s obvious the HTC First isn’t joining in the spec race here, rather it wants to be the phone that the Facebook-addict will buy because it’s $99 (£65) and has access to the latest pictures their friends and family are posting.



Design

HTC has taken a step back to the design language it invoked in 2012. There’s the soft polycarbonate body that you’d expect, not the unibody aluminium that was introduced on the recent HTC One. That’s not to say the polycarbonate body is a bad thing, there’s a solid build quality here, something that HTC has seemingly mastered over the years.
In the hand, the HTC First reminds us a lot of Apple’s iPhone. The handset is 126 x 65 x 8.9mm, where the iPhone 5 is 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6mm - fairly similar. As for weight, it’s not like the HTC First is heavy at 123.9g , but the iPhone 5 is a more lightweight 112g.
 On the front of the HTC First you’ll find a 1.6-megapixel shooter for video chat and plenty of "selfies" to put on Facebook. Below the screen there are three capacative-touch buttons: back, home, and menu. We like what HTC has done with the buttons. Three seems better than four, and we can’t think of any other button we’d need to get in and out of the Facebook Home UI. At the very top of the First there’s a simply power button, and a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Display

The display on the HTC First is surprising. Not because of it’s quality and metrics, but the fact that HTC was willing to jump out of the "who’s bigger" race and go for something a little more modest at 4.3-inches, which seems like the perfect size in-hand.



Hardware and Performance

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor on the HTC First isn’t the latest and greatest, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t zip the device right around. The HTC First is extremely snappy, even with only 1GB of RAM, and it happily takes just about any task thrown at it.
We’ve come to realise that any Android device with a custom skin thrown on top usually lags behind with some extremely great hardware. That’s not the case here. Facebook’s built Home to be relatively light, and that’s exactly why the hardware on the HTC First is plenty to handle it with snappy speeds. We weren’t expecting that, but we are happy to have been proved wrong.
That’s the overall theme of the hardware on this phone. It does just fine. It’s not the monster that has the latest and greatest processor, rather, the HTC First is built modestly to get the job done.

Camera

The rear-camera on the HTC First is lacking, especially for a phone with Instragram pre-loaded - the place where everyone is going to post their cat pictures these days. The HTC First simply can’t compete camera wise to the likes of the iPhone 5, Galaxy S3, or HTC One. We know, the HTC First is a cheaper phone, but we feel like the camera should have been one key focus area, given the market for this device, as something used to share things with social networks.

Verdict

The HTC First is a mid-range phone at best, and we’ve made that clear throughout the review. But that’s not to say the specs here aren’t plenty enough to handle what Facebook Home or stock Android has to throw at it. The HTC First is incredibly snappy, handling most tasks with ease. The cameras need improvement given the social nature of this phone, but they do get by.
This smartphone will especially appeal to the entry-level smartphone buyer who’s going to simply love it because of the fact that it has Facebook thrown on top. Facebook has an aggressive marketing campaign going, even on the front of Facebook.com, so we wouldn’t be surprised if the HTC First, or at least Facebook Home, takes off.
At $99 you’re getting a solid mid-range smartphone. We’re happy HTC jumped out of the smartphone spec race and opted for a modest 4.3-inch screen that will actually appeal to a lot of people. Given there’s stock Android on the HTC First as well, the handset will jump out to those looking for none of HTC or Samsung’s custom Android additions thrown on top, providing Android in its purest form, with a mix of LTE.
The HTC First is not the best phone HTC has made. Rather, it’s the best phone for a Facebook experience that shields the rest of what Android has to offer by default.





Nokia Lumia 920 Review

 Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia’s Lumia 920 is exactly what you think it is, and it is the overall best Windows Phone 8 handset on the market today. But that accolade comes with a couple of caveats, including a size and heft that many will find off-putting. But you get used to it, and the pros absolutely outweigh the cons.
 
Light at the end of the tunnel or the tunnel of light at the end. Nokia is near the point where it couldn't care less - as long as the dark days are finally over for a company, which used to drive an entire industry forward.
Nokia must hardly be enjoying life after Symbian and it shows. The fact is that the Finns have nothing but Ashas and the most basic of S30 phones between the last Windows Phone flagship and the next. The PureView 808 was a flash of brilliance - like the N9 before it - but just that. And a dwindling army of fans still holds on to the memory of a Nokia that was as prolific as it was talented.

Key features

  • Quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE support
  • Quad-band 3G with 42 Mbps HSDPA and 5.7 Mbps HSUPA support
  • 4.5" 16M-color PureMotionHD+ IPS display with a resolution of 1280 x 768 pixels
  • 8 megapixel autofocus camera with LED flash, 1080p@30fps video recording
  • Optical Image stabilization with floating lens technology
  • 1.3MP front-facing camera
  • Windows Phone 8 OS
  • 1.5GHz dual-core Krait CPU, Adreno 225 GPU, Qualcomm MSM8960 chipset, 1GB of RAM
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band
  • GPS receiver with A-GPS and GLONASS support
  • Free lifetime voice-guided navigation
  • 32GB of inbuilt storage
  • Active noise cancellation with a dedicated mic
  • Wireless charging with optional accessories
  • Built-in accelerometer, gyroscope and proximity sensor
  • Standard 3.5 mm audio jack
  • microUSB port
  • Bluetooth v3.0 with A2DP and EDR, file transfers
  • SNS integration
  • Xbox Live integration and Xbox management
  • NFC support
  • Digital compass
  • Nokia Music

 

Main disadvantages

  • App catalog falls short of Android and iOS
  • No microSD card
  • No FM radio
  • No system-wide file manager
  • No lockscreen shortcuts
  • Size and weight something to definitely consider before you buy
  • Audio output not worthy of a flagship
  • Non user-replaceable battery
Nokia may have made all kinds of mistakes in the past couple of years, but the innovation well hasn't obviously dried up. The Lumia 920 features a lot of firsts for both company and industry, the most impressive of which are the optical image stabilization and the PureMotionHD+ display. Wireless charging is more than welcome too though, technically, Palm beat the Finns to it.
A touchscreen that can be operated with gloves sounds exciting enough, but Nokia claims there's more to the new Lumia screen. There are promises of excellent brightness and outdoor visibility, as well as increased responsiveness and smoother scrolling.

Nokia Lumia 720 --- A change --

Verdict

The Nokia Lumia 720 is good looking and easy to slide into your jeans. The bundled Nokia apps are great as well, but it doesn't really offer enough over the Lumia 620, which costs half as much. The 720 certainly looks better, but the 620 is much better value.

Good

  • Sleek, attractive design
  • Easy to use Windows Phone 8 software
  • Great Nokia apps
  • Decent camera

 

 

Should I buy the Nokia Lumia 720?

The Lumia 720's sleek body and relatively small 4.3-inch screen make it much easier to hold than its bigger brother the 920. If you're after a Windows Phone 8 mobile that you won't struggle to get into your pocket, it's worth taking a look at.
Its screen resolution is the same as the 620's, which you can get for less than half the price. Nokia's excellent maps, navigation and local business software is on board, helping to plug the gaping gaps in the Windows Phone app store. Again though, you'll find all of that on the 620 too.
Nokia Lumia 720The 720 packs in a better camera than the 620, so if that's important to you and you value a physically larger screen, it's not a bad option for the price. You'll find most of the same features on the 620 though, and you'll save yourself a bundle if you opt for it over the 720. If you're after the best camera and screen in the Windows Phone world, the Lumia 920 is for you, but you'll have to shell out significantly more if you want to wedge it into your pocket -- but make sure you check out the Lumia 620 first.

Windows Phone 8

The Lumia 720 is running on the latest version of Microsoft's mobile operating system Windows Phone 8. Like Windows Phone 7 before it, its homescreen is made up of a bunch of colourful tiles, each showing live information. You can resize them and move them around to make sure that your most used apps are right at the top.

Conclusion

The Nokia Lumia 720 is slim, attractive, has a decent camera and includes some excellent Nokia software. It's let down by its screen resolution -- which isn't any better than the resolution on its cheaper little brother -- and the Windows Phone 8 app store is still woefully understocked compared to its Android and iOS rivals.
If you're keen to step into the world of Windows Phone and don't fancy shelling out the big bucks for the 920, the 720 is a fair option to consider. If you can cope with the smaller screen size though, the 620 offers most of the same features and will cost you half as much.


Saturday, 13 April 2013

Blackberry Q10 --

Shaped more closely to the BlackBerry Bold line of handsets, which enjoyed a great deal of popularity among the ranks of the "crackberry" faithful, the Q10 boasts a hardware keyboard and powerful mobile components.
On the inside, the device features the same revamped parts you'll find on the touch-screen BlackBerry Z10. This includes a 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 Plus processor, 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of internal memory. In my hands the phone felt fast and responsive, almost like a mini PlayBook tablet.
The keyboard will feel familiar to old BlackBerry hands. It sports similar sculpted edges and frets that the BlackBerry Bold phones use. The key layout is straight rather than curved, though, perhaps to emulate its Z10 sibling. To make room for the keyboard, the screen is smaller, measuring 3.1 inches. It is an AMOLED display, however, so colors looked saturated and blacks dark.

 
The Q10 flaunts a fancier design as well with an all-glass back plate, which has been reinforced by a resin weave for extra durability. Even though BlackBerry makes the claim that the Q10's soft-textured back is a more premium design touch, it felt a bit on the cheap side perhaps because of the light weight of the handset overall.
I do like the speed of the camera, which snapped images almost instantly and locked on to subjects quickly. I would also love to take the TimeShift feature for a spin. Of course like the Z10, it didn't appear that other shooting modes were available, such as HDR or ISO settings.
Another bright point is that the Q10 boasts a bigger 2,100mAh battery, compared with the Z10's 1,800mAh power unit. Interested? Stay tuned for a full review when we get undivided access to RIM's latest keyboard product.